#117504: "Pudding is incorrectly awards negative points"
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
What happened? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are given PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
• Which browser are you using?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
• Which browser are you using?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Which browser are you using?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Which browser are you using?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
• Which browser are you using?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• What was the game action you wanted to do?
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
-
• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
• Which browser are you using?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Which browser are you using?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
• Which browser are you using?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Which browser are you using?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
Report history
BGG's interpretation(?):
The player(s) with the least number of pudding cards in their tableau, and any player(s) with no collected pudding cards lose 6 points.
Everyone else's interpretation (as far as I'm aware):
The player with the least number of pudding cards loses 6 points, where having zero pudding cards is considered less than having one pudding card.
As far as I can tell, the "including 0" is just to note that you can't get out of the penalty by "not playing" and avoiding collecting any pudding cards.
The example the rules give is:
> Example: Chris has 4 pudding cards,
> Meredith has 2, and Kerry and Andrew
> have 1. Chris scores 6 points. Kerry and
> Andrew both lose 6 points.
This suggests to me BGA is incorrect, otherwise they're being self-inconsistent by treating 1 vs 0 differently from 2 vs 1.
Your bug has probably been fixed already, or was linked to a temporary failure of BGA service.
In any case, when filling a bug report, make sure to have an explicit title linked to the incident (ex: with error message), so other players can recognize it and vote for it.
Add to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
