#118702: "Implement Card Sorting: Either Fixed Sort or Player Sort"
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
What happened? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are given PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. -
• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v123
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. -
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v123
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v123
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v123
-
• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. -
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v123
-
• What was the game action you wanted to do?
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. -
• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?
-
• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v123
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. -
• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v123
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v123
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. -
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v123
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v123
Report history
[Clay-/Clay]->[Wood/Wood]->[Wood/Charcoal]->[Charcoal/Charcoal]->[Charcoal/Food]
Add to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
