#128579: "Automatically assign resources to slots when no conflict"
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
What happened? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are given PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.
If a player has less than 1+2+3 of three resource types they should be automatically assigned to storage spots as it makes no material difference.
Having to click through all the storage options is tedious and can also lead to mistakes - I once automatically clicked through, knowing I only had 1+2 resources and yet one was discarded as I allocated 2 to the top spot. The interface is particularly difficult on mobile.
Thank you for your work! -
• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v125
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
If a player has less than 1+2+3 of three resource types they should be automatically assigned to storage spots as it makes no material difference.
Having to click through all the storage options is tedious and can also lead to mistakes - I once automatically clicked through, knowing I only had 1+2 resources and yet one was discarded as I allocated 2 to the top spot. The interface is particularly difficult on mobile.
Thank you for your work! -
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v125
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
If a player has less than 1+2+3 of three resource types they should be automatically assigned to storage spots as it makes no material difference.
Having to click through all the storage options is tedious and can also lead to mistakes - I once automatically clicked through, knowing I only had 1+2 resources and yet one was discarded as I allocated 2 to the top spot. The interface is particularly difficult on mobile.
Thank you for your work! • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v125
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
If a player has less than 1+2+3 of three resource types they should be automatically assigned to storage spots as it makes no material difference.
Having to click through all the storage options is tedious and can also lead to mistakes - I once automatically clicked through, knowing I only had 1+2 resources and yet one was discarded as I allocated 2 to the top spot. The interface is particularly difficult on mobile.
Thank you for your work! • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v125
-
• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?
If a player has less than 1+2+3 of three resource types they should be automatically assigned to storage spots as it makes no material difference.
Having to click through all the storage options is tedious and can also lead to mistakes - I once automatically clicked through, knowing I only had 1+2 resources and yet one was discarded as I allocated 2 to the top spot. The interface is particularly difficult on mobile.
Thank you for your work! -
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v125
-
• What was the game action you wanted to do?
If a player has less than 1+2+3 of three resource types they should be automatically assigned to storage spots as it makes no material difference.
Having to click through all the storage options is tedious and can also lead to mistakes - I once automatically clicked through, knowing I only had 1+2 resources and yet one was discarded as I allocated 2 to the top spot. The interface is particularly difficult on mobile.
Thank you for your work! -
• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?
-
• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v125
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?
If a player has less than 1+2+3 of three resource types they should be automatically assigned to storage spots as it makes no material difference.
Having to click through all the storage options is tedious and can also lead to mistakes - I once automatically clicked through, knowing I only had 1+2 resources and yet one was discarded as I allocated 2 to the top spot. The interface is particularly difficult on mobile.
Thank you for your work! -
• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v125
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
If a player has less than 1+2+3 of three resource types they should be automatically assigned to storage spots as it makes no material difference.
Having to click through all the storage options is tedious and can also lead to mistakes - I once automatically clicked through, knowing I only had 1+2 resources and yet one was discarded as I allocated 2 to the top spot. The interface is particularly difficult on mobile.
Thank you for your work! • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v125
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
If a player has less than 1+2+3 of three resource types they should be automatically assigned to storage spots as it makes no material difference.
Having to click through all the storage options is tedious and can also lead to mistakes - I once automatically clicked through, knowing I only had 1+2 resources and yet one was discarded as I allocated 2 to the top spot. The interface is particularly difficult on mobile.
Thank you for your work! -
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v125
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
If a player has less than 1+2+3 of three resource types they should be automatically assigned to storage spots as it makes no material difference.
Having to click through all the storage options is tedious and can also lead to mistakes - I once automatically clicked through, knowing I only had 1+2 resources and yet one was discarded as I allocated 2 to the top spot. The interface is particularly difficult on mobile.
Thank you for your work! • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v125
Report history
Add to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
