• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.

This card is difficult to understand the way it is worded.

The current wording is ambiguous and makes it sounds like you score 13 points, but that you also score one less point for each of your Theme tag scores; so 4 red tags would only score 3 points instead of 4. It's as if you are making a sacrifice in your theme score so that you can score the 13 points of this card.

Instead of the current wording, I would suggest something like," This card is worth one point less for each Theme tag you have in play." Or, if you want to go more minimal: "Subtract one point from your final score for each Theme tag."

If you cannot change the graphics on the card it would be easy and helpful to include in the card's hover overlay (see the other suggestion report regarding card overlays being helpful for players).

• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened

• Which browser are you using?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

This card is difficult to understand the way it is worded.

The current wording is ambiguous and makes it sounds like you score 13 points, but that you also score one less point for each of your Theme tag scores; so 4 red tags would only score 3 points instead of 4. It's as if you are making a sacrifice in your theme score so that you can score the 13 points of this card.

Instead of the current wording, I would suggest something like," This card is worth one point less for each Theme tag you have in play." Or, if you want to go more minimal: "Subtract one point from your final score for each Theme tag."

If you cannot change the graphics on the card it would be easy and helpful to include in the card's hover overlay (see the other suggestion report regarding card overlays being helpful for players).

• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

This card is difficult to understand the way it is worded.

The current wording is ambiguous and makes it sounds like you score 13 points, but that you also score one less point for each of your Theme tag scores; so 4 red tags would only score 3 points instead of 4. It's as if you are making a sacrifice in your theme score so that you can score the 13 points of this card.

Instead of the current wording, I would suggest something like," This card is worth one point less for each Theme tag you have in play." Or, if you want to go more minimal: "Subtract one point from your final score for each Theme tag."

If you cannot change the graphics on the card it would be easy and helpful to include in the card's hover overlay (see the other suggestion report regarding card overlays being helpful for players).

• Which browser are you using?

• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)

This card is difficult to understand the way it is worded.

The current wording is ambiguous and makes it sounds like you score 13 points, but that you also score one less point for each of your Theme tag scores; so 4 red tags would only score 3 points instead of 4. It's as if you are making a sacrifice in your theme score so that you can score the 13 points of this card.

Instead of the current wording, I would suggest something like," This card is worth one point less for each Theme tag you have in play." Or, if you want to go more minimal: "Subtract one point from your final score for each Theme tag."

If you cannot change the graphics on the card it would be easy and helpful to include in the card's hover overlay (see the other suggestion report regarding card overlays being helpful for players).

• Which browser are you using?

• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?

This card is difficult to understand the way it is worded.

The current wording is ambiguous and makes it sounds like you score 13 points, but that you also score one less point for each of your Theme tag scores; so 4 red tags would only score 3 points instead of 4. It's as if you are making a sacrifice in your theme score so that you can score the 13 points of this card.

Instead of the current wording, I would suggest something like," This card is worth one point less for each Theme tag you have in play." Or, if you want to go more minimal: "Subtract one point from your final score for each Theme tag."

If you cannot change the graphics on the card it would be easy and helpful to include in the card's hover overlay (see the other suggestion report regarding card overlays being helpful for players).

• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?

• Which browser are you using?

• What was the game action you wanted to do?

This card is difficult to understand the way it is worded.

The current wording is ambiguous and makes it sounds like you score 13 points, but that you also score one less point for each of your Theme tag scores; so 4 red tags would only score 3 points instead of 4. It's as if you are making a sacrifice in your theme score so that you can score the 13 points of this card.

Instead of the current wording, I would suggest something like," This card is worth one point less for each Theme tag you have in play." Or, if you want to go more minimal: "Subtract one point from your final score for each Theme tag."

If you cannot change the graphics on the card it would be easy and helpful to include in the card's hover overlay (see the other suggestion report regarding card overlays being helpful for players).

• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?

• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Which browser are you using?

• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?

This card is difficult to understand the way it is worded.

The current wording is ambiguous and makes it sounds like you score 13 points, but that you also score one less point for each of your Theme tag scores; so 4 red tags would only score 3 points instead of 4. It's as if you are making a sacrifice in your theme score so that you can score the 13 points of this card.

Instead of the current wording, I would suggest something like," This card is worth one point less for each Theme tag you have in play." Or, if you want to go more minimal: "Subtract one point from your final score for each Theme tag."

If you cannot change the graphics on the card it would be easy and helpful to include in the card's hover overlay (see the other suggestion report regarding card overlays being helpful for players).

• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

This card is difficult to understand the way it is worded.

The current wording is ambiguous and makes it sounds like you score 13 points, but that you also score one less point for each of your Theme tag scores; so 4 red tags would only score 3 points instead of 4. It's as if you are making a sacrifice in your theme score so that you can score the 13 points of this card.

Instead of the current wording, I would suggest something like," This card is worth one point less for each Theme tag you have in play." Or, if you want to go more minimal: "Subtract one point from your final score for each Theme tag."

If you cannot change the graphics on the card it would be easy and helpful to include in the card's hover overlay (see the other suggestion report regarding card overlays being helpful for players).

• Which browser are you using?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

This card is difficult to understand the way it is worded.

The current wording is ambiguous and makes it sounds like you score 13 points, but that you also score one less point for each of your Theme tag scores; so 4 red tags would only score 3 points instead of 4. It's as if you are making a sacrifice in your theme score so that you can score the 13 points of this card.

Instead of the current wording, I would suggest something like," This card is worth one point less for each Theme tag you have in play." Or, if you want to go more minimal: "Subtract one point from your final score for each Theme tag."

If you cannot change the graphics on the card it would be easy and helpful to include in the card's hover overlay (see the other suggestion report regarding card overlays being helpful for players).

• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

This card is difficult to understand the way it is worded.

The current wording is ambiguous and makes it sounds like you score 13 points, but that you also score one less point for each of your Theme tag scores; so 4 red tags would only score 3 points instead of 4. It's as if you are making a sacrifice in your theme score so that you can score the 13 points of this card.

Instead of the current wording, I would suggest something like," This card is worth one point less for each Theme tag you have in play." Or, if you want to go more minimal: "Subtract one point from your final score for each Theme tag."

If you cannot change the graphics on the card it would be easy and helpful to include in the card's hover overlay (see the other suggestion report regarding card overlays being helpful for players).

• Which browser are you using?