• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened

• Which browser are you using?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Which browser are you using?

• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Which browser are you using?

• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?

• Which browser are you using?

• What was the game action you wanted to do?

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?

• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Which browser are you using?

• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Which browser are you using?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Which browser are you using?