• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.

Currently, abstaining automatically votes for the player to your right. In situations where lovers are seated next to each other but everyone agrees to abstain, the player to the right of the lover couple is immediately eliminated, casting suspicion on the left-most lover (as they are unable to vote for their lover to their right, the vote is passed on). If everyone abstains, the game should just progress forward without forcing a vote. If at least one person doesn't abstain, a simple message stating "Someone didn't abstain" or something should appear and force another vote.

• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened

• Which browser are you using?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

Currently, abstaining automatically votes for the player to your right. In situations where lovers are seated next to each other but everyone agrees to abstain, the player to the right of the lover couple is immediately eliminated, casting suspicion on the left-most lover (as they are unable to vote for their lover to their right, the vote is passed on). If everyone abstains, the game should just progress forward without forcing a vote. If at least one person doesn't abstain, a simple message stating "Someone didn't abstain" or something should appear and force another vote.

• Which browser are you using?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

Currently, abstaining automatically votes for the player to your right. In situations where lovers are seated next to each other but everyone agrees to abstain, the player to the right of the lover couple is immediately eliminated, casting suspicion on the left-most lover (as they are unable to vote for their lover to their right, the vote is passed on). If everyone abstains, the game should just progress forward without forcing a vote. If at least one person doesn't abstain, a simple message stating "Someone didn't abstain" or something should appear and force another vote.

• Which browser are you using?

• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)

Currently, abstaining automatically votes for the player to your right. In situations where lovers are seated next to each other but everyone agrees to abstain, the player to the right of the lover couple is immediately eliminated, casting suspicion on the left-most lover (as they are unable to vote for their lover to their right, the vote is passed on). If everyone abstains, the game should just progress forward without forcing a vote. If at least one person doesn't abstain, a simple message stating "Someone didn't abstain" or something should appear and force another vote.

• Which browser are you using?

• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?

Currently, abstaining automatically votes for the player to your right. In situations where lovers are seated next to each other but everyone agrees to abstain, the player to the right of the lover couple is immediately eliminated, casting suspicion on the left-most lover (as they are unable to vote for their lover to their right, the vote is passed on). If everyone abstains, the game should just progress forward without forcing a vote. If at least one person doesn't abstain, a simple message stating "Someone didn't abstain" or something should appear and force another vote.

• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?

• Which browser are you using?

• What was the game action you wanted to do?

Currently, abstaining automatically votes for the player to your right. In situations where lovers are seated next to each other but everyone agrees to abstain, the player to the right of the lover couple is immediately eliminated, casting suspicion on the left-most lover (as they are unable to vote for their lover to their right, the vote is passed on). If everyone abstains, the game should just progress forward without forcing a vote. If at least one person doesn't abstain, a simple message stating "Someone didn't abstain" or something should appear and force another vote.

• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?

• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Which browser are you using?

• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?

Currently, abstaining automatically votes for the player to your right. In situations where lovers are seated next to each other but everyone agrees to abstain, the player to the right of the lover couple is immediately eliminated, casting suspicion on the left-most lover (as they are unable to vote for their lover to their right, the vote is passed on). If everyone abstains, the game should just progress forward without forcing a vote. If at least one person doesn't abstain, a simple message stating "Someone didn't abstain" or something should appear and force another vote.

• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Currently, abstaining automatically votes for the player to your right. In situations where lovers are seated next to each other but everyone agrees to abstain, the player to the right of the lover couple is immediately eliminated, casting suspicion on the left-most lover (as they are unable to vote for their lover to their right, the vote is passed on). If everyone abstains, the game should just progress forward without forcing a vote. If at least one person doesn't abstain, a simple message stating "Someone didn't abstain" or something should appear and force another vote.

• Which browser are you using?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

Currently, abstaining automatically votes for the player to your right. In situations where lovers are seated next to each other but everyone agrees to abstain, the player to the right of the lover couple is immediately eliminated, casting suspicion on the left-most lover (as they are unable to vote for their lover to their right, the vote is passed on). If everyone abstains, the game should just progress forward without forcing a vote. If at least one person doesn't abstain, a simple message stating "Someone didn't abstain" or something should appear and force another vote.

• Which browser are you using?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

Currently, abstaining automatically votes for the player to your right. In situations where lovers are seated next to each other but everyone agrees to abstain, the player to the right of the lover couple is immediately eliminated, casting suspicion on the left-most lover (as they are unable to vote for their lover to their right, the vote is passed on). If everyone abstains, the game should just progress forward without forcing a vote. If at least one person doesn't abstain, a simple message stating "Someone didn't abstain" or something should appear and force another vote.

• Which browser are you using?