#14388: "If all players abstain, no need for a second voting"
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
What happened? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are given PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.
Currently there are two rounds of voting if there is a tie in the first. But when everyone abstains and there is a tie to 1 vote for each player, adding a second round of voting is not necessary. It would save a bit of time if this second voting is skipped in this scenario.
-
• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v79
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Currently there are two rounds of voting if there is a tie in the first. But when everyone abstains and there is a tie to 1 vote for each player, adding a second round of voting is not necessary. It would save a bit of time if this second voting is skipped in this scenario.
-
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v79
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Currently there are two rounds of voting if there is a tie in the first. But when everyone abstains and there is a tie to 1 vote for each player, adding a second round of voting is not necessary. It would save a bit of time if this second voting is skipped in this scenario.
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v79
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
Currently there are two rounds of voting if there is a tie in the first. But when everyone abstains and there is a tie to 1 vote for each player, adding a second round of voting is not necessary. It would save a bit of time if this second voting is skipped in this scenario.
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v79
-
• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?
Currently there are two rounds of voting if there is a tie in the first. But when everyone abstains and there is a tie to 1 vote for each player, adding a second round of voting is not necessary. It would save a bit of time if this second voting is skipped in this scenario.
-
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v79
-
• What was the game action you wanted to do?
Currently there are two rounds of voting if there is a tie in the first. But when everyone abstains and there is a tie to 1 vote for each player, adding a second round of voting is not necessary. It would save a bit of time if this second voting is skipped in this scenario.
-
• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?
-
• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v79
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?
Currently there are two rounds of voting if there is a tie in the first. But when everyone abstains and there is a tie to 1 vote for each player, adding a second round of voting is not necessary. It would save a bit of time if this second voting is skipped in this scenario.
-
• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v79
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Currently there are two rounds of voting if there is a tie in the first. But when everyone abstains and there is a tie to 1 vote for each player, adding a second round of voting is not necessary. It would save a bit of time if this second voting is skipped in this scenario.
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v79
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Currently there are two rounds of voting if there is a tie in the first. But when everyone abstains and there is a tie to 1 vote for each player, adding a second round of voting is not necessary. It would save a bit of time if this second voting is skipped in this scenario.
-
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v79
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Currently there are two rounds of voting if there is a tie in the first. But when everyone abstains and there is a tie to 1 vote for each player, adding a second round of voting is not necessary. It would save a bit of time if this second voting is skipped in this scenario.
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v79
Report history
If someone votes to their right neighbor it would not be abstaining, so the second voting would be triggered.
If there is a tie to everyone receiving 1 vote due to crossed votes (and not because of abs), then the second voting would also be needed.
Please note this is different than issue 13858, which suggests to treat all abs as no-votes.
Add to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
