• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened

• Which browser are you using?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• Which browser are you using?

• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• Which browser are you using?

• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?

• Which browser are you using?

• What was the game action you wanted to do?

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?

• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Which browser are you using?

• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• Which browser are you using?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• Which browser are you using?