#156955: "Some statistics are clearly wrong"
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
What happened? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are given PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.
Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png
1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs. -
• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v131
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png
1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs. -
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v131
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png
1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs. • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v131
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png
1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs. • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v131
-
• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?
Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png
1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs. -
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v131
-
• What was the game action you wanted to do?
Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png
1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs. -
• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?
-
• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v131
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?
Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png
1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs. -
• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v131
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png
1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs. • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v131
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png
1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs. -
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v131
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png
1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs. • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v131
Report history
Add to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
