#168182: ""Correct code" had one useless verifier"
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
What happened? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are given PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.
Every verifier must be meaningful to find the code. If I can get to the code with an useless verifier, it means that code cannot be a correct proposition, which was the case in this match.
One can deduce the proposed "correct" code 135 without knowing whether the last color is odd or even, thus making that verifier useless. -
• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened
Checking the game proposed solution you can see that one verifier is useless
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v135
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Every verifier must be meaningful to find the code. If I can get to the code with an useless verifier, it means that code cannot be a correct proposition, which was the case in this match.
One can deduce the proposed "correct" code 135 without knowing whether the last color is odd or even, thus making that verifier useless. -
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
Checking the game proposed solution you can see that one verifier is useless
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v135
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Every verifier must be meaningful to find the code. If I can get to the code with an useless verifier, it means that code cannot be a correct proposition, which was the case in this match.
One can deduce the proposed "correct" code 135 without knowing whether the last color is odd or even, thus making that verifier useless. • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v135
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
Every verifier must be meaningful to find the code. If I can get to the code with an useless verifier, it means that code cannot be a correct proposition, which was the case in this match.
One can deduce the proposed "correct" code 135 without knowing whether the last color is odd or even, thus making that verifier useless. • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v135
-
• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?
Every verifier must be meaningful to find the code. If I can get to the code with an useless verifier, it means that code cannot be a correct proposition, which was the case in this match.
One can deduce the proposed "correct" code 135 without knowing whether the last color is odd or even, thus making that verifier useless. -
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
Checking the game proposed solution you can see that one verifier is useless
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v135
-
• What was the game action you wanted to do?
Every verifier must be meaningful to find the code. If I can get to the code with an useless verifier, it means that code cannot be a correct proposition, which was the case in this match.
One can deduce the proposed "correct" code 135 without knowing whether the last color is odd or even, thus making that verifier useless. -
• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?
Checking the game proposed solution you can see that one verifier is useless
-
• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v135
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?
Every verifier must be meaningful to find the code. If I can get to the code with an useless verifier, it means that code cannot be a correct proposition, which was the case in this match.
One can deduce the proposed "correct" code 135 without knowing whether the last color is odd or even, thus making that verifier useless. -
• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
Checking the game proposed solution you can see that one verifier is useless
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v135
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Every verifier must be meaningful to find the code. If I can get to the code with an useless verifier, it means that code cannot be a correct proposition, which was the case in this match.
One can deduce the proposed "correct" code 135 without knowing whether the last color is odd or even, thus making that verifier useless. • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v135
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Every verifier must be meaningful to find the code. If I can get to the code with an useless verifier, it means that code cannot be a correct proposition, which was the case in this match.
One can deduce the proposed "correct" code 135 without knowing whether the last color is odd or even, thus making that verifier useless. -
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
Checking the game proposed solution you can see that one verifier is useless
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v135
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Every verifier must be meaningful to find the code. If I can get to the code with an useless verifier, it means that code cannot be a correct proposition, which was the case in this match.
One can deduce the proposed "correct" code 135 without knowing whether the last color is odd or even, thus making that verifier useless. • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v135
Report history
By last color I mean the third one, the purple circle.
And yes I understand how verifier C works, and my point is that if you remove that verifier entirely you can still get to the answer 135, it doesn't matter which of the 6 possible tests it does
Because of the A verifier, the purple circle cannot be the lowest number either, thus forcing the blue triangle to be lowest.
Because of the Tr+Sq=4, we know that Tr=1 and Sq=3, and then since Sq<Ci, Circle can only be 4 or 5.
Since there are no numbers in ascending order it cannot be 4, so the only possible code is 135, never needing the C verifier
D is testing only one of the three items showed, and they are not exclusive. So if the test is "is blue lower or equal than the other ones", then yeah it would give a fail on 3,1,4 but still would allow the 2,2,4 combination.
I had misunderstood the rules for the D verifier.
Thank you for explaining and closing the bug report
Add to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
