#171312: "Agents should not steal Elo from each other"
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
What happened? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are given PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.
In boardgamearena.com/table?table=682655493, two agents beat the imposter. The lower rated agent is considered as tied with the other agent, thus stealing them some Elo.
The higher rated agent is always bound to lose Elo to the lower rated agent given the role distribution. -
• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
In boardgamearena.com/table?table=682655493, two agents beat the imposter. The lower rated agent is considered as tied with the other agent, thus stealing them some Elo.
The higher rated agent is always bound to lose Elo to the lower rated agent given the role distribution. -
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
In boardgamearena.com/table?table=682655493, two agents beat the imposter. The lower rated agent is considered as tied with the other agent, thus stealing them some Elo.
The higher rated agent is always bound to lose Elo to the lower rated agent given the role distribution. • Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
In boardgamearena.com/table?table=682655493, two agents beat the imposter. The lower rated agent is considered as tied with the other agent, thus stealing them some Elo.
The higher rated agent is always bound to lose Elo to the lower rated agent given the role distribution. • Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?
In boardgamearena.com/table?table=682655493, two agents beat the imposter. The lower rated agent is considered as tied with the other agent, thus stealing them some Elo.
The higher rated agent is always bound to lose Elo to the lower rated agent given the role distribution. -
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• What was the game action you wanted to do?
In boardgamearena.com/table?table=682655493, two agents beat the imposter. The lower rated agent is considered as tied with the other agent, thus stealing them some Elo.
The higher rated agent is always bound to lose Elo to the lower rated agent given the role distribution. -
• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?
-
• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?
In boardgamearena.com/table?table=682655493, two agents beat the imposter. The lower rated agent is considered as tied with the other agent, thus stealing them some Elo.
The higher rated agent is always bound to lose Elo to the lower rated agent given the role distribution. -
• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
In boardgamearena.com/table?table=682655493, two agents beat the imposter. The lower rated agent is considered as tied with the other agent, thus stealing them some Elo.
The higher rated agent is always bound to lose Elo to the lower rated agent given the role distribution. • Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
In boardgamearena.com/table?table=682655493, two agents beat the imposter. The lower rated agent is considered as tied with the other agent, thus stealing them some Elo.
The higher rated agent is always bound to lose Elo to the lower rated agent given the role distribution. -
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
In boardgamearena.com/table?table=682655493, two agents beat the imposter. The lower rated agent is considered as tied with the other agent, thus stealing them some Elo.
The higher rated agent is always bound to lose Elo to the lower rated agent given the role distribution. • Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
Report history
(But I guess to solve this issue, BGA framework must be changed, as the single game just calculate the scores and BGA calculate the Elo.)
In some games Insider/prof.no wins with 2 stars, making all other and sometimes a special role which wins along the insider only getting 1 star being counted as loser win almost no change to elo and not sharing win with insider.
Add to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
