#173219: "Random role for Special Role 1 only"
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
What happened? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are given PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.
It would be nice if you could set a random role at Special Role 1 for competetive variation such as arena gameplay and some casual games. That would provide nice variation for each game. 1 Special role is often sufficient for 4 player games. Setting random role 1 would restrict the host to set a 2nd special role to prevent bad matchup as indicated in the rules. (Simply picking random at 1st would not allow the Special role 2 to appear)
I understand having 2 random roles can make very bad combos such as having 2 visible agents and some other bad combos. So 1 should be possible?
-
• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
It would be nice if you could set a random role at Special Role 1 for competetive variation such as arena gameplay and some casual games. That would provide nice variation for each game. 1 Special role is often sufficient for 4 player games. Setting random role 1 would restrict the host to set a 2nd special role to prevent bad matchup as indicated in the rules. (Simply picking random at 1st would not allow the Special role 2 to appear)
I understand having 2 random roles can make very bad combos such as having 2 visible agents and some other bad combos. So 1 should be possible?
-
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
It would be nice if you could set a random role at Special Role 1 for competetive variation such as arena gameplay and some casual games. That would provide nice variation for each game. 1 Special role is often sufficient for 4 player games. Setting random role 1 would restrict the host to set a 2nd special role to prevent bad matchup as indicated in the rules. (Simply picking random at 1st would not allow the Special role 2 to appear)
I understand having 2 random roles can make very bad combos such as having 2 visible agents and some other bad combos. So 1 should be possible?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
It would be nice if you could set a random role at Special Role 1 for competetive variation such as arena gameplay and some casual games. That would provide nice variation for each game. 1 Special role is often sufficient for 4 player games. Setting random role 1 would restrict the host to set a 2nd special role to prevent bad matchup as indicated in the rules. (Simply picking random at 1st would not allow the Special role 2 to appear)
I understand having 2 random roles can make very bad combos such as having 2 visible agents and some other bad combos. So 1 should be possible?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?
It would be nice if you could set a random role at Special Role 1 for competetive variation such as arena gameplay and some casual games. That would provide nice variation for each game. 1 Special role is often sufficient for 4 player games. Setting random role 1 would restrict the host to set a 2nd special role to prevent bad matchup as indicated in the rules. (Simply picking random at 1st would not allow the Special role 2 to appear)
I understand having 2 random roles can make very bad combos such as having 2 visible agents and some other bad combos. So 1 should be possible?
-
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• What was the game action you wanted to do?
It would be nice if you could set a random role at Special Role 1 for competetive variation such as arena gameplay and some casual games. That would provide nice variation for each game. 1 Special role is often sufficient for 4 player games. Setting random role 1 would restrict the host to set a 2nd special role to prevent bad matchup as indicated in the rules. (Simply picking random at 1st would not allow the Special role 2 to appear)
I understand having 2 random roles can make very bad combos such as having 2 visible agents and some other bad combos. So 1 should be possible?
-
• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?
-
• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?
It would be nice if you could set a random role at Special Role 1 for competetive variation such as arena gameplay and some casual games. That would provide nice variation for each game. 1 Special role is often sufficient for 4 player games. Setting random role 1 would restrict the host to set a 2nd special role to prevent bad matchup as indicated in the rules. (Simply picking random at 1st would not allow the Special role 2 to appear)
I understand having 2 random roles can make very bad combos such as having 2 visible agents and some other bad combos. So 1 should be possible?
-
• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
It would be nice if you could set a random role at Special Role 1 for competetive variation such as arena gameplay and some casual games. That would provide nice variation for each game. 1 Special role is often sufficient for 4 player games. Setting random role 1 would restrict the host to set a 2nd special role to prevent bad matchup as indicated in the rules. (Simply picking random at 1st would not allow the Special role 2 to appear)
I understand having 2 random roles can make very bad combos such as having 2 visible agents and some other bad combos. So 1 should be possible?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
It would be nice if you could set a random role at Special Role 1 for competetive variation such as arena gameplay and some casual games. That would provide nice variation for each game. 1 Special role is often sufficient for 4 player games. Setting random role 1 would restrict the host to set a 2nd special role to prevent bad matchup as indicated in the rules. (Simply picking random at 1st would not allow the Special role 2 to appear)
I understand having 2 random roles can make very bad combos such as having 2 visible agents and some other bad combos. So 1 should be possible?
-
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
It would be nice if you could set a random role at Special Role 1 for competetive variation such as arena gameplay and some casual games. That would provide nice variation for each game. 1 Special role is often sufficient for 4 player games. Setting random role 1 would restrict the host to set a 2nd special role to prevent bad matchup as indicated in the rules. (Simply picking random at 1st would not allow the Special role 2 to appear)
I understand having 2 random roles can make very bad combos such as having 2 visible agents and some other bad combos. So 1 should be possible?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
Report history
boardgamearena.com/bug?id=172376
And someone there is mentioning having playing with only 1 random role as a possible option.
I think having 1 random is a possible option too add. You can always check ingame what role is being used in the game.
Add to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
