• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.

It would be nice if you could set a random role at Special Role 1 for competetive variation such as arena gameplay and some casual games. That would provide nice variation for each game. 1 Special role is often sufficient for 4 player games. Setting random role 1 would restrict the host to set a 2nd special role to prevent bad matchup as indicated in the rules. (Simply picking random at 1st would not allow the Special role 2 to appear)

I understand having 2 random roles can make very bad combos such as having 2 visible agents and some other bad combos. So 1 should be possible?

• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened

• Which browser are you using?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

It would be nice if you could set a random role at Special Role 1 for competetive variation such as arena gameplay and some casual games. That would provide nice variation for each game. 1 Special role is often sufficient for 4 player games. Setting random role 1 would restrict the host to set a 2nd special role to prevent bad matchup as indicated in the rules. (Simply picking random at 1st would not allow the Special role 2 to appear)

I understand having 2 random roles can make very bad combos such as having 2 visible agents and some other bad combos. So 1 should be possible?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

It would be nice if you could set a random role at Special Role 1 for competetive variation such as arena gameplay and some casual games. That would provide nice variation for each game. 1 Special role is often sufficient for 4 player games. Setting random role 1 would restrict the host to set a 2nd special role to prevent bad matchup as indicated in the rules. (Simply picking random at 1st would not allow the Special role 2 to appear)

I understand having 2 random roles can make very bad combos such as having 2 visible agents and some other bad combos. So 1 should be possible?

• Which browser are you using?

• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)

It would be nice if you could set a random role at Special Role 1 for competetive variation such as arena gameplay and some casual games. That would provide nice variation for each game. 1 Special role is often sufficient for 4 player games. Setting random role 1 would restrict the host to set a 2nd special role to prevent bad matchup as indicated in the rules. (Simply picking random at 1st would not allow the Special role 2 to appear)

I understand having 2 random roles can make very bad combos such as having 2 visible agents and some other bad combos. So 1 should be possible?

• Which browser are you using?

• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?

It would be nice if you could set a random role at Special Role 1 for competetive variation such as arena gameplay and some casual games. That would provide nice variation for each game. 1 Special role is often sufficient for 4 player games. Setting random role 1 would restrict the host to set a 2nd special role to prevent bad matchup as indicated in the rules. (Simply picking random at 1st would not allow the Special role 2 to appear)

I understand having 2 random roles can make very bad combos such as having 2 visible agents and some other bad combos. So 1 should be possible?

• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?

• Which browser are you using?

• What was the game action you wanted to do?

It would be nice if you could set a random role at Special Role 1 for competetive variation such as arena gameplay and some casual games. That would provide nice variation for each game. 1 Special role is often sufficient for 4 player games. Setting random role 1 would restrict the host to set a 2nd special role to prevent bad matchup as indicated in the rules. (Simply picking random at 1st would not allow the Special role 2 to appear)

I understand having 2 random roles can make very bad combos such as having 2 visible agents and some other bad combos. So 1 should be possible?

• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?

• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Which browser are you using?

• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?

It would be nice if you could set a random role at Special Role 1 for competetive variation such as arena gameplay and some casual games. That would provide nice variation for each game. 1 Special role is often sufficient for 4 player games. Setting random role 1 would restrict the host to set a 2nd special role to prevent bad matchup as indicated in the rules. (Simply picking random at 1st would not allow the Special role 2 to appear)

I understand having 2 random roles can make very bad combos such as having 2 visible agents and some other bad combos. So 1 should be possible?

• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

It would be nice if you could set a random role at Special Role 1 for competetive variation such as arena gameplay and some casual games. That would provide nice variation for each game. 1 Special role is often sufficient for 4 player games. Setting random role 1 would restrict the host to set a 2nd special role to prevent bad matchup as indicated in the rules. (Simply picking random at 1st would not allow the Special role 2 to appear)

I understand having 2 random roles can make very bad combos such as having 2 visible agents and some other bad combos. So 1 should be possible?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

It would be nice if you could set a random role at Special Role 1 for competetive variation such as arena gameplay and some casual games. That would provide nice variation for each game. 1 Special role is often sufficient for 4 player games. Setting random role 1 would restrict the host to set a 2nd special role to prevent bad matchup as indicated in the rules. (Simply picking random at 1st would not allow the Special role 2 to appear)

I understand having 2 random roles can make very bad combos such as having 2 visible agents and some other bad combos. So 1 should be possible?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

It would be nice if you could set a random role at Special Role 1 for competetive variation such as arena gameplay and some casual games. That would provide nice variation for each game. 1 Special role is often sufficient for 4 player games. Setting random role 1 would restrict the host to set a 2nd special role to prevent bad matchup as indicated in the rules. (Simply picking random at 1st would not allow the Special role 2 to appear)

I understand having 2 random roles can make very bad combos such as having 2 visible agents and some other bad combos. So 1 should be possible?

• Which browser are you using?