#17548: "not feeding the meeples at all gives an unfair advantage"
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
What happened? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are given PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
-
• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
-
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
-
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• What was the game action you wanted to do?
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
-
• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?
-
• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
-
• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
-
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
Report history
I already have rejected similar request in the past, it seems that people are not looking to rejected request before creating a new one, so I leave this one opened. But it won't be done.
It's not so easy to do : you lose 10 points every round, you refuse to win points by agriculture level, and you let other players have agriculture very easily.
As mentioned by admitted, in 2-player, is usually suicide in high-level games; I've seen instances where a temporary 10-pt sacrifice was useful, but the pure "get babies and to heck with food" philosophy does not work well enough to beat 400's and up.
Add to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
