#177999: "Blackmailer (9-2) and foggy swamp, not considering the next *played* card"
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
What happened? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are given PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.
Foggy Swamp was not taken account of by the blackmailer's ability: the blackmailer cares about the card you play next, like the librarian (6-2), which works fine :-)
In the case of this game, I was asked to discard for the following card, not the card I had the choice to play or not. -
• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened
yes, turn 6
• Which browser are you using?
opera
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
Foggy Swamp was not taken account of by the blackmailer's ability: the blackmailer cares about the card you play next, like the librarian (6-2), which works fine :-)
In the case of this game, I was asked to discard for the following card, not the card I had the choice to play or not. • Which browser are you using?
opera
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Foggy Swamp was not taken account of by the blackmailer's ability: the blackmailer cares about the card you play next, like the librarian (6-2), which works fine :-)
In the case of this game, I was asked to discard for the following card, not the card I had the choice to play or not. • Which browser are you using?
opera
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
Foggy Swamp was not taken account of by the blackmailer's ability: the blackmailer cares about the card you play next, like the librarian (6-2), which works fine :-)
In the case of this game, I was asked to discard for the following card, not the card I had the choice to play or not. • Which browser are you using?
opera
-
• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?
Foggy Swamp was not taken account of by the blackmailer's ability: the blackmailer cares about the card you play next, like the librarian (6-2), which works fine :-)
In the case of this game, I was asked to discard for the following card, not the card I had the choice to play or not. -
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
yes, turn 6
• Which browser are you using?
opera
-
• What was the game action you wanted to do?
Foggy Swamp was not taken account of by the blackmailer's ability: the blackmailer cares about the card you play next, like the librarian (6-2), which works fine :-)
In the case of this game, I was asked to discard for the following card, not the card I had the choice to play or not. -
• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?
yes, turn 6
-
• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
opera
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?
Foggy Swamp was not taken account of by the blackmailer's ability: the blackmailer cares about the card you play next, like the librarian (6-2), which works fine :-)
In the case of this game, I was asked to discard for the following card, not the card I had the choice to play or not. -
• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
yes, turn 6
• Which browser are you using?
opera
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Foggy Swamp was not taken account of by the blackmailer's ability: the blackmailer cares about the card you play next, like the librarian (6-2), which works fine :-)
In the case of this game, I was asked to discard for the following card, not the card I had the choice to play or not. • Which browser are you using?
opera
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
Foggy Swamp was not taken account of by the blackmailer's ability: the blackmailer cares about the card you play next, like the librarian (6-2), which works fine :-)
In the case of this game, I was asked to discard for the following card, not the card I had the choice to play or not. • Which browser are you using?
opera
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Foggy Swamp was not taken account of by the blackmailer's ability: the blackmailer cares about the card you play next, like the librarian (6-2), which works fine :-)
In the case of this game, I was asked to discard for the following card, not the card I had the choice to play or not. • Which browser are you using?
opera
Report history
In Game 2, opponent's Blackmailer named yellow, the effect did not go away after I played a yellow the following move, or even 2 more later, and a full 4 turns after Blackmailer it made me discard 2 when I couldn't play a 4th yellow. Effect seems to be active until missed instead of just the next pair.
Add to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
