#24619: "Initial placement in base rule (not Michael setup)"
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
What happened? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are given PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.
Base rule states we should be able to place the first 4 tiles on diagonal, knowing all of them.
By now, we only have 2 choices :
- automatic placement in ascending order (not always the most strategic)
- Michael variant.
-
• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened
no
• Which browser are you using?
Firefox 80
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Base rule states we should be able to place the first 4 tiles on diagonal, knowing all of them.
By now, we only have 2 choices :
- automatic placement in ascending order (not always the most strategic)
- Michael variant.
-
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
no
• Which browser are you using?
Firefox 80
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Base rule states we should be able to place the first 4 tiles on diagonal, knowing all of them.
By now, we only have 2 choices :
- automatic placement in ascending order (not always the most strategic)
- Michael variant.
• Which browser are you using?
Firefox 80
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
Base rule states we should be able to place the first 4 tiles on diagonal, knowing all of them.
By now, we only have 2 choices :
- automatic placement in ascending order (not always the most strategic)
- Michael variant.
• Which browser are you using?
Firefox 80
-
• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?
Base rule states we should be able to place the first 4 tiles on diagonal, knowing all of them.
By now, we only have 2 choices :
- automatic placement in ascending order (not always the most strategic)
- Michael variant.
-
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
no
• Which browser are you using?
Firefox 80
-
• What was the game action you wanted to do?
Base rule states we should be able to place the first 4 tiles on diagonal, knowing all of them.
By now, we only have 2 choices :
- automatic placement in ascending order (not always the most strategic)
- Michael variant.
-
• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?
no
-
• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Firefox 80
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?
Base rule states we should be able to place the first 4 tiles on diagonal, knowing all of them.
By now, we only have 2 choices :
- automatic placement in ascending order (not always the most strategic)
- Michael variant.
-
• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
no
• Which browser are you using?
Firefox 80
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Base rule states we should be able to place the first 4 tiles on diagonal, knowing all of them.
By now, we only have 2 choices :
- automatic placement in ascending order (not always the most strategic)
- Michael variant.
• Which browser are you using?
Firefox 80
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Base rule states we should be able to place the first 4 tiles on diagonal, knowing all of them.
By now, we only have 2 choices :
- automatic placement in ascending order (not always the most strategic)
- Michael variant.
-
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
no
• Which browser are you using?
Firefox 80
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Base rule states we should be able to place the first 4 tiles on diagonal, knowing all of them.
By now, we only have 2 choices :
- automatic placement in ascending order (not always the most strategic)
- Michael variant.
• Which browser are you using?
Firefox 80
Report history
I will talk to the publisher again, maybe I'll leave it as easy setup and add a "original setup" or something similar.
Well, at the end of a game, on upper-left bottom-right diagonal, there are almost always something like :
1-5 / 6-10 / 11-15 / 16-20.
If I have 2-6-7-13, I think it is a good idea to place them as 2-7-13-6. The 6 will be annoying at beginning (and will be swaped quickly), but 2, 7 & 13 can stay at their place perhaps until end of game.
And moreover, this is a bug since the rules are not respected because it is written "They should keep in mind and xxx" instead of "they must place xxx".
Providing this setup as an option (or even as the default option maybe since this is the rules) would greatly enhance the game.
Add to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
