#3166: "objective card IX: highest total building costs in each city"
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
What happened? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are given PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.
the scoring VPs for this card don't match up with any combination of figures that i have tried.
-
• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened
final scoring
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v43
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
the scoring VPs for this card don't match up with any combination of figures that i have tried.
-
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
final scoring
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v43
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
the scoring VPs for this card don't match up with any combination of figures that i have tried.
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v43
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
the scoring VPs for this card don't match up with any combination of figures that i have tried.
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v43
-
• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?
the scoring VPs for this card don't match up with any combination of figures that i have tried.
-
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
final scoring
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v43
-
• What was the game action you wanted to do?
the scoring VPs for this card don't match up with any combination of figures that i have tried.
-
• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?
final scoring
-
• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v43
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?
the scoring VPs for this card don't match up with any combination of figures that i have tried.
-
• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
final scoring
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v43
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
the scoring VPs for this card don't match up with any combination of figures that i have tried.
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v43
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
the scoring VPs for this card don't match up with any combination of figures that i have tried.
-
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
final scoring
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v43
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
the scoring VPs for this card don't match up with any combination of figures that i have tried.
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v43
Report history
Final scoring:
The players add their building costs in each city.
For each city, the player(s) with the highest total receive(s) VPs for that city:
- Livorno 14 VPs
- Pisa 12 VPs
- Lucca 10 VPs
- Viareggio 8 VPs
- Massa 6 VPs
- Lerici 4 VPs
game example #1: 14559461
both players only built in lucca and lerici.
senatorhung had the highest building block count in lerici. hiker had the highest building count in lucca. my interpretation of the tooltip is that senatorhung should get 4 VPs for lerici, and hiker should get 10 VPs for lucca for that objective card. however, the displayed values at the end of the game for objective IX were senatorhung 44 VPs and hiker 50 VPs.
game example #2: 14508111
senatorhung had the highest building block count in lucca. hdp had the highest building block count in pisa, massa, and lerici. so by my understanding of the tooltip, that should have been senatorhung 10 VPs, hdp 12 + 6 + 4 = 22 VPs. however, the displayed values at the end of the game for objective IX were Hdp 44 VPs, senatorhung 32 VPs.
how are those numbers calculated ? are the values of the building blocks for each city somehow added to those listed on the card ?
This is now fixed, thanks for the detailed report!
Add to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
