• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened

• Which browser are you using?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Which browser are you using?

• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Which browser are you using?

• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?

• Which browser are you using?

• What was the game action you wanted to do?

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?

• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Which browser are you using?

• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Which browser are you using?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Which browser are you using?