• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened

• Which browser are you using?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• Which browser are you using?

• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• Which browser are you using?

• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?

• Which browser are you using?

• What was the game action you wanted to do?

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?

• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Which browser are you using?

• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• Which browser are you using?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• Which browser are you using?