#50874: "need a tie breaker for multi elimination tournaments"
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
What happened? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are given PRIORITY!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Detailed description
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.
It is important for tournaments that let more then one player advance to the next round( instead of being totally random). My suggestion is to first count who has the least artichokes left, then who has most other cards (the least artichoke %) and third later see who has the latest starting playing order.• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v94
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
It is important for tournaments that let more then one player advance to the next round( instead of being totally random). My suggestion is to first count who has the least artichokes left, then who has most other cards (the least artichoke %) and third later see who has the latest starting playing order.• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v94
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
It is important for tournaments that let more then one player advance to the next round( instead of being totally random). My suggestion is to first count who has the least artichokes left, then who has most other cards (the least artichoke %) and third later see who has the latest starting playing order.• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v94
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
It is important for tournaments that let more then one player advance to the next round( instead of being totally random). My suggestion is to first count who has the least artichokes left, then who has most other cards (the least artichoke %) and third later see who has the latest starting playing order.• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v94
• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation
It is important for tournaments that let more then one player advance to the next round( instead of being totally random). My suggestion is to first count who has the least artichokes left, then who has most other cards (the least artichoke %) and third later see who has the latest starting playing order.• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v94
• What was the game action you wanted to do?
It is important for tournaments that let more then one player advance to the next round( instead of being totally random). My suggestion is to first count who has the least artichokes left, then who has most other cards (the least artichoke %) and third later see who has the latest starting playing order.• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?
• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v94
• At which step of the game did the problem occur (what was the current game instruction)?
It is important for tournaments that let more then one player advance to the next round( instead of being totally random). My suggestion is to first count who has the least artichokes left, then who has most other cards (the least artichoke %) and third later see who has the latest starting playing order.• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v94
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
It is important for tournaments that let more then one player advance to the next round( instead of being totally random). My suggestion is to first count who has the least artichokes left, then who has most other cards (the least artichoke %) and third later see who has the latest starting playing order.• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v94
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
It is important for tournaments that let more then one player advance to the next round( instead of being totally random). My suggestion is to first count who has the least artichokes left, then who has most other cards (the least artichoke %) and third later see who has the latest starting playing order.• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v94
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
It is important for tournaments that let more then one player advance to the next round( instead of being totally random). My suggestion is to first count who has the least artichokes left, then who has most other cards (the least artichoke %) and third later see who has the latest starting playing order.• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v94
Report history
Arena mode defaults to two players, and I think that's the best way to play AAA as a tournament as well.
Is there a particular reason you want to have tournaments with more than 2 players per game?
boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=23004&p=98210#p98210
and
boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=23452
how to limit a tournament to two players, but there was no reply.
Also, the tournament FAQ says:
"Can I create tournaments for any games on the website?
Yes. However, only 2 players games are supported by the 2 types of tournaments currently supported."
so I don't even know how you can do tournaments in non-2-player-mode.
The suggested tie breakers were not acceptable to the game author.
There will be no technical solution, the tournament organizers need to be taught to only do 2-player-tournaments for Abandon All Artichokes.
Add to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.