#57600: "Decline All Power as an Option"
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
What happened? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are given PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.
Scenarios: Turn based games, games with Cultists, larger games with 4/5 people, etc.
Example:
If users select "automatically sacrifice 1VP for 2 power", they will still always be asked if other VP to power conversions occur. Such as "do you want to sacrifice 2VP for 3 power, 3VP for 4 power? etc. There are plenty of scenarios such as the last 2 rounds, or perhaps in a game with cultists, where I don't want to sacrifice any power at all. Asking the question to everyone can really slow the game down.
Suggestion:
Offer a "automatically decline sacrificing VP for power" or even more simple "decline all power" as a pre-selected option eliminates the turn hold that occurs and should greatly speed the game up. -
• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Scenarios: Turn based games, games with Cultists, larger games with 4/5 people, etc.
Example:
If users select "automatically sacrifice 1VP for 2 power", they will still always be asked if other VP to power conversions occur. Such as "do you want to sacrifice 2VP for 3 power, 3VP for 4 power? etc. There are plenty of scenarios such as the last 2 rounds, or perhaps in a game with cultists, where I don't want to sacrifice any power at all. Asking the question to everyone can really slow the game down.
Suggestion:
Offer a "automatically decline sacrificing VP for power" or even more simple "decline all power" as a pre-selected option eliminates the turn hold that occurs and should greatly speed the game up. -
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Scenarios: Turn based games, games with Cultists, larger games with 4/5 people, etc.
Example:
If users select "automatically sacrifice 1VP for 2 power", they will still always be asked if other VP to power conversions occur. Such as "do you want to sacrifice 2VP for 3 power, 3VP for 4 power? etc. There are plenty of scenarios such as the last 2 rounds, or perhaps in a game with cultists, where I don't want to sacrifice any power at all. Asking the question to everyone can really slow the game down.
Suggestion:
Offer a "automatically decline sacrificing VP for power" or even more simple "decline all power" as a pre-selected option eliminates the turn hold that occurs and should greatly speed the game up. • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v97
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
Scenarios: Turn based games, games with Cultists, larger games with 4/5 people, etc.
Example:
If users select "automatically sacrifice 1VP for 2 power", they will still always be asked if other VP to power conversions occur. Such as "do you want to sacrifice 2VP for 3 power, 3VP for 4 power? etc. There are plenty of scenarios such as the last 2 rounds, or perhaps in a game with cultists, where I don't want to sacrifice any power at all. Asking the question to everyone can really slow the game down.
Suggestion:
Offer a "automatically decline sacrificing VP for power" or even more simple "decline all power" as a pre-selected option eliminates the turn hold that occurs and should greatly speed the game up. • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?
Scenarios: Turn based games, games with Cultists, larger games with 4/5 people, etc.
Example:
If users select "automatically sacrifice 1VP for 2 power", they will still always be asked if other VP to power conversions occur. Such as "do you want to sacrifice 2VP for 3 power, 3VP for 4 power? etc. There are plenty of scenarios such as the last 2 rounds, or perhaps in a game with cultists, where I don't want to sacrifice any power at all. Asking the question to everyone can really slow the game down.
Suggestion:
Offer a "automatically decline sacrificing VP for power" or even more simple "decline all power" as a pre-selected option eliminates the turn hold that occurs and should greatly speed the game up. -
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v97
-
• What was the game action you wanted to do?
Scenarios: Turn based games, games with Cultists, larger games with 4/5 people, etc.
Example:
If users select "automatically sacrifice 1VP for 2 power", they will still always be asked if other VP to power conversions occur. Such as "do you want to sacrifice 2VP for 3 power, 3VP for 4 power? etc. There are plenty of scenarios such as the last 2 rounds, or perhaps in a game with cultists, where I don't want to sacrifice any power at all. Asking the question to everyone can really slow the game down.
Suggestion:
Offer a "automatically decline sacrificing VP for power" or even more simple "decline all power" as a pre-selected option eliminates the turn hold that occurs and should greatly speed the game up. -
• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?
-
• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v97
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?
Scenarios: Turn based games, games with Cultists, larger games with 4/5 people, etc.
Example:
If users select "automatically sacrifice 1VP for 2 power", they will still always be asked if other VP to power conversions occur. Such as "do you want to sacrifice 2VP for 3 power, 3VP for 4 power? etc. There are plenty of scenarios such as the last 2 rounds, or perhaps in a game with cultists, where I don't want to sacrifice any power at all. Asking the question to everyone can really slow the game down.
Suggestion:
Offer a "automatically decline sacrificing VP for power" or even more simple "decline all power" as a pre-selected option eliminates the turn hold that occurs and should greatly speed the game up. -
• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Scenarios: Turn based games, games with Cultists, larger games with 4/5 people, etc.
Example:
If users select "automatically sacrifice 1VP for 2 power", they will still always be asked if other VP to power conversions occur. Such as "do you want to sacrifice 2VP for 3 power, 3VP for 4 power? etc. There are plenty of scenarios such as the last 2 rounds, or perhaps in a game with cultists, where I don't want to sacrifice any power at all. Asking the question to everyone can really slow the game down.
Suggestion:
Offer a "automatically decline sacrificing VP for power" or even more simple "decline all power" as a pre-selected option eliminates the turn hold that occurs and should greatly speed the game up. • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Scenarios: Turn based games, games with Cultists, larger games with 4/5 people, etc.
Example:
If users select "automatically sacrifice 1VP for 2 power", they will still always be asked if other VP to power conversions occur. Such as "do you want to sacrifice 2VP for 3 power, 3VP for 4 power? etc. There are plenty of scenarios such as the last 2 rounds, or perhaps in a game with cultists, where I don't want to sacrifice any power at all. Asking the question to everyone can really slow the game down.
Suggestion:
Offer a "automatically decline sacrificing VP for power" or even more simple "decline all power" as a pre-selected option eliminates the turn hold that occurs and should greatly speed the game up. -
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Scenarios: Turn based games, games with Cultists, larger games with 4/5 people, etc.
Example:
If users select "automatically sacrifice 1VP for 2 power", they will still always be asked if other VP to power conversions occur. Such as "do you want to sacrifice 2VP for 3 power, 3VP for 4 power? etc. There are plenty of scenarios such as the last 2 rounds, or perhaps in a game with cultists, where I don't want to sacrifice any power at all. Asking the question to everyone can really slow the game down.
Suggestion:
Offer a "automatically decline sacrificing VP for power" or even more simple "decline all power" as a pre-selected option eliminates the turn hold that occurs and should greatly speed the game up. • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v97
Report history
+
From memory, I think power gains actually are automatically declined on a player's behalf once they have passed in the last round..? But yes, some settings for declining power would absolutely be extremely helpful.
Unfortunately not. I thought this would be the case, was stressed with time and left the game after passing in the last round. Later I learned that I timed out due to the power vs VP question :/
Add to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
