• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened

• Which browser are you using?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• Which browser are you using?

• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• Which browser are you using?

• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?

• Which browser are you using?

• What was the game action you wanted to do?

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?

• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Which browser are you using?

• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• Which browser are you using?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

• Which browser are you using?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• Which browser are you using?