#76245: "No ELO for 2 player games"
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
What happened? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are given PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.
In a two player game of Tigris and Euphrates, only one of two things can happen. 1) One player doesn't know how to play. 2) The person with the most red tiles wins. If both people know how to play in a two player game, eventually you will end up with a large kingdom that can't be broken apart that has a distinct advantage. At this point, the person who can win the most internal conflicts (revolts) wins. No ELO points should be awarded for winning a two player game.
-
• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
In a two player game of Tigris and Euphrates, only one of two things can happen. 1) One player doesn't know how to play. 2) The person with the most red tiles wins. If both people know how to play in a two player game, eventually you will end up with a large kingdom that can't be broken apart that has a distinct advantage. At this point, the person who can win the most internal conflicts (revolts) wins. No ELO points should be awarded for winning a two player game.
-
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
In a two player game of Tigris and Euphrates, only one of two things can happen. 1) One player doesn't know how to play. 2) The person with the most red tiles wins. If both people know how to play in a two player game, eventually you will end up with a large kingdom that can't be broken apart that has a distinct advantage. At this point, the person who can win the most internal conflicts (revolts) wins. No ELO points should be awarded for winning a two player game.
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v107
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
In a two player game of Tigris and Euphrates, only one of two things can happen. 1) One player doesn't know how to play. 2) The person with the most red tiles wins. If both people know how to play in a two player game, eventually you will end up with a large kingdom that can't be broken apart that has a distinct advantage. At this point, the person who can win the most internal conflicts (revolts) wins. No ELO points should be awarded for winning a two player game.
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?
In a two player game of Tigris and Euphrates, only one of two things can happen. 1) One player doesn't know how to play. 2) The person with the most red tiles wins. If both people know how to play in a two player game, eventually you will end up with a large kingdom that can't be broken apart that has a distinct advantage. At this point, the person who can win the most internal conflicts (revolts) wins. No ELO points should be awarded for winning a two player game.
-
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v107
-
• What was the game action you wanted to do?
In a two player game of Tigris and Euphrates, only one of two things can happen. 1) One player doesn't know how to play. 2) The person with the most red tiles wins. If both people know how to play in a two player game, eventually you will end up with a large kingdom that can't be broken apart that has a distinct advantage. At this point, the person who can win the most internal conflicts (revolts) wins. No ELO points should be awarded for winning a two player game.
-
• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?
-
• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v107
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?
In a two player game of Tigris and Euphrates, only one of two things can happen. 1) One player doesn't know how to play. 2) The person with the most red tiles wins. If both people know how to play in a two player game, eventually you will end up with a large kingdom that can't be broken apart that has a distinct advantage. At this point, the person who can win the most internal conflicts (revolts) wins. No ELO points should be awarded for winning a two player game.
-
• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
In a two player game of Tigris and Euphrates, only one of two things can happen. 1) One player doesn't know how to play. 2) The person with the most red tiles wins. If both people know how to play in a two player game, eventually you will end up with a large kingdom that can't be broken apart that has a distinct advantage. At this point, the person who can win the most internal conflicts (revolts) wins. No ELO points should be awarded for winning a two player game.
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
In a two player game of Tigris and Euphrates, only one of two things can happen. 1) One player doesn't know how to play. 2) The person with the most red tiles wins. If both people know how to play in a two player game, eventually you will end up with a large kingdom that can't be broken apart that has a distinct advantage. At this point, the person who can win the most internal conflicts (revolts) wins. No ELO points should be awarded for winning a two player game.
-
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
In a two player game of Tigris and Euphrates, only one of two things can happen. 1) One player doesn't know how to play. 2) The person with the most red tiles wins. If both people know how to play in a two player game, eventually you will end up with a large kingdom that can't be broken apart that has a distinct advantage. At this point, the person who can win the most internal conflicts (revolts) wins. No ELO points should be awarded for winning a two player game.
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v107
Report history
Add to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
