#81590: "Lords Scoring incorrectly"
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
What happened? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are given PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
-
• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened
Final - part of scoring.
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v110
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
-
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
Final - part of scoring.
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v110
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v110
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v110
-
• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
-
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
Final - part of scoring.
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v110
-
• What was the game action you wanted to do?
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
-
• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?
Final - part of scoring.
-
• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v110
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
-
• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
Final - part of scoring.
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v110
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v110
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
-
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
Final - part of scoring.
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v110
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v110
Report history
Lords scoring incorrect in two player game. One player had only majority of houses in two quadrants and 2nd in one quadrant - this should total 30 points but received 36 points.
The other player had correctly 36 points with majority in two quadrants and 2nd in two.
Add to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
