• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.

Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.

• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened

Still in game...

• Which browser are you using?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.

• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

Still in game...

• Which browser are you using?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.

• Which browser are you using?

• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)

Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.

• Which browser are you using?

• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?

Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.

• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?

Still in game...

• Which browser are you using?

• What was the game action you wanted to do?

Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.

• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?

Still in game...

• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Which browser are you using?

• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?

Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.

• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

Still in game...

• Which browser are you using?

• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.

• Which browser are you using?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.

• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

Still in game...

• Which browser are you using?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.

• Which browser are you using?