All reports
Saint Petersburg reports
#47769: "no need to be sorted when cards flip."
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
Suggestion: in my opinion, the following would greatly improve the game implementation
Detailed description
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
when cards appear, cards are sorted.
but, I want to know who caused to flip 18 aristocrat on aristocrat phase.
I suggest not to be sorted when cards flip.• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v92
Report history
Sep 4th 2021 12:06 • Faceman255 • This suggestion has not been analyzed by the developers yet:
It makes the game more interesting.
Sep 4th 2021 18:38 • Inaofr • Developers would like more information about this suggestion:
So you want drawn cards to be placed on the board in the order they were drawn?
If yes I think most players would dislike it, in my view it is easier to evaluate your next move then cards are sorted. I do not really understand what more you would know if the cards were not sorted.
If yes I think most players would dislike it, in my view it is easier to evaluate your next move then cards are sorted. I do not really understand what more you would know if the cards were not sorted.
Sep 14th 2021 15:29 • debjwillis • Developers would like more information about this suggestion:
I agree. I often wonder what the order is of the cards that come up in the next phase so I can better determine the effects of previous actions. Perhaps there's a way to first show the order that the cards came up in when beginning the new phase, and then provide a button where the player could autosort the cards by value when they are ready to do so?
Sep 27th 2021 10:13 • Faceman255 • Developers would like more information about this suggestion:
Yes, I think cards should be placed on the board in the order they were drawn.
Jun 1st 2022 4:07 • Faceman255 • Developers would like more information about this suggestion:
In this game, mistress on the 1st round is very important.
In my opinion, arist 4th starter should not flip 4th arist.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, we can know who caused to flip mistress.
On the other situation, we sometimes take the meaningless card to flip more UG cards.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, we can know whether the playing worked.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, the game becomes more interesting.
If real play, we can know it.
In my opinion, arist 4th starter should not flip 4th arist.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, we can know who caused to flip mistress.
On the other situation, we sometimes take the meaningless card to flip more UG cards.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, we can know whether the playing worked.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, the game becomes more interesting.
If real play, we can know it.
Jun 1st 2022 4:15 • Faceman255 • Developers would like more information about this suggestion:
the reason why take meaningless card to flip more UG cards, to flip UG arist.
it sometimes happens at the last round.
it sometimes happens at the last round.
Jun 1st 2022 4:34 • Faceman255 • Developers would like more information about this suggestion:
it is a problem that we can't know the information that we can know at the real game.
Jun 7th 2024 13:57 • bananasplay • Developers would like more information about this suggestion:
As debjwillis writes, one benefit of knowing the order of cards drawn is to ascertain the effects of previous actions. If one, for example, purchases or reserves a card in a given phase, one more card is drawn in the next phase—/which/ card, however, remains a mystery in the current implementation because the cards are automatically sorted. But if the cards were instead shown in the order drawn, the "extra" card would be obvious.
I've upvoted this suggestion, but I think that it should be implemented as a player's preference, with the default setting corresponding to the way the game currently operates, so as to provide no disruption to all players who are used to the current functionality.
Alternatively, if the log were to indicate which cards are drawn—one card per log entry in the order drawn—I think that that would be an acceptable alternative to implementing a player's preference.
I've upvoted this suggestion, but I think that it should be implemented as a player's preference, with the default setting corresponding to the way the game currently operates, so as to provide no disruption to all players who are used to the current functionality.
Alternatively, if the log were to indicate which cards are drawn—one card per log entry in the order drawn—I think that that would be an acceptable alternative to implementing a player's preference.
Jun 14th 2024 18:43 • TaxMan5x • Developers would like more information about this suggestion:
It's an interesting suggestion, but it reminds me of "chasing the rabbit" in hold em poker. While it's interesting to see if your choice was the correct one, it won't (or shouldn't) change your mind about that prior choice. Beyond self-validation, it doesn't really add anything to the game or your strategy.
Add to this report
Please add here anything that seems relevant in order to reproduce this bug or understand your suggestion:
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
