All reports
Hanamikoji reports
#88778: "More time for the players"
rejected: Developers think that it is not a good idea or that the cost/benefit ratio is too high
1
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
Suggestion: in my opinion, the following would greatly improve the game implementation
Detailed description
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
The game is a brainburner and it is not easy to decide which should be the next move.
I played 15 games so far and in 50% of the games, either myself or the opponent went over the time limit.
But the game needs time to think, I would suggest to either start with a higher start time, or to raise the time limit between moves by 30 seconds.• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v113
Report history
May 17th 2023 16:03 • Broxi4769 • This suggestion has not been analyzed by the developers yet:
everything else works already great
May 18th 2023 3:51 • ufm • Developers think that it is not a good idea or that the cost/benefit ratio is too high:
The time limit is automatically adjusted according to the average time spent.
Unless the game does not add extra time at the end of a turn (due to a bug) or there are too few sample games (less than 50 games, probably?), you are playing slower than average BGA users.
Unless the game does not add extra time at the end of a turn (due to a bug) or there are too few sample games (less than 50 games, probably?), you are playing slower than average BGA users.
Add to this report
Please add here anything that seems relevant in order to reproduce this bug or understand your suggestion:
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
